More and more families are relying on credit cards to weather the storm during economic hardships and are being targeted by billion dollar credit card companies and their criminal practices. Recent emphasis on this topic has been making headlines but little has been done to crack down on predatory lending practices.

The most widely spread tactic used by credit card companies is targeting low income, high debt, or minority markets. On top of offering high interest credit to consumers with a higher debt to income ratio, said lenders often times tack on absorbent fees, added-on products or features and charge excessive penalties. So in essence, if you have not-so-great credit you are a credit card companies ideal client. What a great way to kick the hard working American people when they are down. What is worse, is that when offered these lines of credit, more often than not, they do not give you the amount that they offer. As well, they include “acceptance” fees of nearly one-third of the limit that is given, also processing fees, annual fees, etc. So by the time the card reaches the consumer they are nearly maxed out, most of the time not knowing, and as soon as they use the extended credit they go over the limit and are charged costly penalties.

Many companies that use these strategies to fatten their pockets also fail to follow the guidelines set under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Many reports of collection agencies calling numerous times a day, at late hours or extremely early in the morning, using profanity, false titles, and claims and/or threats to extort payment from the targeted consumer. Little is done to protect or educate the nations public about the laws that are set aside to protect them. A large portion of said companies also include “mandatory arbitration” clauses into their contracts which make it very difficult if not impossible to take action against them.

The fact is, what these lenders are doing is deceptive in nature. They justify their fees and rates by targeting “high risk” consumers and then trap them further into the credit trap. Further-more, they justify the rates, fees and penalties they charge because the consumers that they themselves target are “high-risk”. How about them apples?

Additionally, Credit card companies have been adding universal default clauses to the terms of credit card agreements. The universal default clause allows credit card companies to pull your credit report on a regular basis. If you have been late on any payments, a higher interest rate can be added to your credit card or all of your credit cards. This includes even being one day late on your mortgage, car, or utility bill (if it is reported to the credit reporting agencies). This could not only increase the interest rate on future purchases, but also raise the interest rate on the consumers entire outstanding balance. I.E. if you are late even just once on your car payment, your credit card interest rate could jump from 8% to 29% without you ever being notified. This will be very harmful for consumers who are late on even just one payment with a different credit card or payment that is reported to your credit report.

In following articles I will talk more about how to prevent predatory lending, what to do if you feel victimized or targeted, and ways to get out of credit card debt. I will also cover topics dealing with foreclosure, medical bills and the like. If you would like immediate assistance with getting out of the credit card trap visit my website or if you have general questions I will be happy to offer my knowledge and experience.

Posted by admin | No Comments »

The first issue of concern is improved communication to subprime borrowers about the real, hidden cost of their adjustable rate mortgage (ARM) loans. This kind of loan is often suggested to subprime borrowers because the introductory rate of interest is so low - so low, in fact, that it’s often called a “teaser rate”. Before the appearance of the government Statement, ARM loans assessed huge penalty fees for refinancing the loan or prepaying it before the term expires. Often, the penalties continued for most of the duration of the loan.

Regulators tighten rules for subprime lending in the Statement by providing guidelines requiring subprime lenders to offer full disclosure of fees and rates associated with an ARM. Moreover, they state that “liar loans,” loans that ignore a borrower’s capability of repaying the loan and require no documentation of earnings, must be curtailed. These liar loans are also called “stated income loans,” “low-doc loans,” and “no-doc loans.” A borrower simply states the amount of his income, without being required to produce a W2 form or pay stubs to substantiate his statement. Based on what he has claimed, he qualifies for a loan he cannot really afford. It’s clear that this practice is the cause of at least part of the subprime market problem!

The Statement is specific about predatory and deceptive lending practices - what they are, and why they must not be used. Such predatory practices often victimize those who may not really understand what they are being asked to sign, members of particularly vulnerable groups: the elderly, minorities, and first-time home buyers. It is also very clear about the fact that not all subprime lenders can be considered predatory.

If you are a subprime buyer, what do these new regulations mean to you? For one thing, you can’t be entrapped in an ARM with an upcoming reset date: 60 days notice is now required. If you decide to refinance early in the loan, or if for some reason you become able to repay it early, no astronomical prepayment fees will be assessed. Lenders must now require proper documentation to verify income. This is a positive improvement, because a subprime borrower should never borrow more than he will really be able to repay. Many subprime financial institutions have gone under in recent years, simply because they ignored the critical need to determine accurately each home buyer’s capability to meet financial obligations. The regulations force subprime lenders to deal more ethically with subprime borrowers. They must show due diligence with their determination of these borrowers’ future solvency. Foreclosures ruin local real estate markets, as well as borrowers and lenders.

Earlier guidelines issued by the regulatory agencies have been tightened by the Statement. Some have been incorporated into its text; others, like the 2001 Expanded Guidance, are referenced. The intention of the federal agencies in tightening the rules for subprime lending is to protect subprime borrowers from lenders of questionable integrity, and to protect lenders from ruining themselves because of laxity in their underwriting practices. This document is bound to have a positive effect on the current downward-spiraling real estate market.

Posted by admin | No Comments »

The loans worldwide multi-billion dollar industry is an industry where people borrowing from banks, financial institutions and other private lenders. In the last couple of years, the lending industry has gone through an evolution and has given way to social lending as the new and promising way of a loan. Also known as peer-to-peer lending or person to person (P2P) lending, one of the first companies to establish the social basis for loans are ZOPA, Prosper and, more recently, LendingClub.

ZOPA is considered the first credit market in the world and its roots are in the UK. With the launch and immediate success of ZOPA, other peer to peer lenders have emerged as Prosper in the U.S., in Boob Smava Netherlands and Germany.

If you are wondering whether the P2P offering loans in the social lending sites are worthwhile or not the most likely answer is yes. There is not much of a difference in terms of these loans P2P centers and a bank loan deals. The difference lies in the fact that there are no banks, no long procedures, and not an intermediary and, above all, the whole process is transparent to both lenders and borrowers (no more hidden hard to find loan agreements).

The main objective of the local loan is a loan offer in line with best interest rates and for customers to feel like they are borrowing from a friend or community. This peer to peer indebtedness is growing in a new light and is being considered as part of the loan (which was more traditionally offered by small banks in the local community).

Other benefits:

 Creating a new class of assets: Credit institutions in any of the peer to peer loan centers can now take advantage of a new asset class, which can add to your portfolio, as it does not enter into an investment or even a savings account.

 Selection of interest rates and loan repayment: There are several advantages for lenders as borrowers. In loans as social centers or ZOPA Prosper, lenders have the freedom and flexibility of choosing a loan amortization period of time, as well as the interest rate on loans P2P.

 active participation of the community: one of the highlights is that this kind of a center of loans that borrowers feel as if they were next to a real person and not an organization or a faceless institution. Therefore, assistance in developing a strong sense of community.

Credit institutions in any of the social lending websites have the power to set a minimum interest rate they want to win and can offer an increase of $ 50 to $ 25,000 loan through advertisements. Borrowers can create a list of loans for a period of 3 years, and borrow an amortized and unsecured loan of up to $ 25,000 and the maximum interest rate they can pay to a lender.

The success of ZOPA is in its facts and figures. They are the largest lender today and have provided in excess of $ 930,000. The return on investment for lenders has been around 5.01%, which is healthy, especially in the wake of the fact that social lending is still in its nascent stages. One of the major lenders even have a ROI of 19.8% on loans social websites.

Lenders

At the moment you are thinking that these lenders are really? Are banks in disguise or that other people really are? The truth is that people really are. Take ZOPA and Prosper, for example. Both houses of loans are backed by Benchmark Capital, which also funded eBay. Prosper or ZOPA are the best alternatives that anyone can take to banks or other lending institutions, however, are limited to the United Kingdom and the United States. UU. Markets.

The current business model is based on ZOPA 1% rate that borrowers are paying them in advance. In return, ZOPA is offering borrowers a better interest rate cut out by the intermediary bank. More than that, a borrower will have greater control throughout the lending process and has the flexibility to set interest rates.

ZOPA is an acronym for Zone of Possible Agreement, and its lenders includes only UK residents who are over 18 years of age. To qualify as a lender, a person needs to have a valid bank account and a personal high credit Equifax. There are two restrictions for becoming a lender, which are as follows:

• Lenders have to be individuals and not companies.

• Lenders are not entitled to receive just over £ 25000 (47.000 dollars) in outstanding loans at a given point in time.

The American counterpart of ZOPA is Prosper, and also handle maximum loan of $ 25,000 at a time. At this point the future of social lending is brilliant, as he has beaten New Zealand and Australia with the first peer to peer lending center in Australia to launch soon Loans Hub (you can see in lendinghub.com your site . au and their active blog at blog.lendinghub.com.au), which will offer P2P loans with a strong community-based approach to ensure a truly social experience for borrowers and lenders instead of being just a transaction loan online tool.

Posted by pooch | 1 Comment »